Franchise brand comparison
Restore Hyper Wellness vs SWTHZ
Compared on figures each brand discloses in its own Franchise Disclosure Document — 2025 for Restore Hyper Wellness, 2026 for SWTHZ. Investment, fees, and Item 19 gross sales, with the sample size behind every average.
Short answer
Restore discloses 59% more revenue — $911,516 against $573,762 — but the number that should decide this is sample size, not average. Restore reports across 198 studios; SWTHZ reports across 13. Thirteen locations is a description of thirteen locations, not of a system, and it tells you almost nothing about what a new unit will do. SWTHZ enters about $77,000 cheaper at the midpoint, and its royalty starts at 6% and steps up by studio age rather than sitting flat at Restore's 7% — though its 3% brand fund is the heaviest in the category. Both are well under 1.0x capital efficiency, 0.87x against 0.59x. SWTHZ is the newer and far less proven system; whatever territory availability advantage that brings should be weighed against having very little disclosed performance to underwrite.
Side by side
| Measure | Restore Hyper Wellness | SWTHZ |
|---|---|---|
| Concept category | Recovery & wellness | Recovery & wellness |
| FDD year | 2025 | 2026 |
| Total investment (Item 7) | $777,174–$1,323,425midpoint $1,050,300 | $631,798–$1,314,102midpoint $972,950 |
| Initial franchise fee | $44,500 | $45,000 |
| Royalty | 7% | 6–8% by studio age |
| Brand fund | 2% | 3% |
| Local advertising | None disclosed separately | None disclosed separately |
| Average gross sales (Item 19) | $911,516198 units — franchised studios open 12+ months, FY2024 | $573,76213 units — franchised locations open all of FY2024 |
| Median gross sales | $850,994 | $556,226 |
| Top quartile | $1,360,000 | Not disclosed |
| Bottom quartile | $554,427 | Not disclosed |
| Revenue ÷ investment | 0.87x | 0.59x |
| Quartile spread | 2.5x | — |
Bolded figures mark the stronger side of a row where both brands disclose a comparable number — lower investment, higher revenue, higher return on capital, narrower quartile spread. A brand that discloses nothing is never marked as losing a row: an undisclosed figure is an unknown, not a poor result.
What the numbers mean
Investment is Item 7, the franchisor's own estimate of everything needed to open. Restore Hyper Wellness discloses a total initial investment of $777,174 to $1,323,425 in its 2025 FDD, a midpoint of $1,050,300, with an initial franchise fee of $44,500. SWTHZ discloses a total initial investment of $631,798 to $1,314,102 in its 2026 FDD, a midpoint of $972,950, with an initial franchise fee of $45,000.
Revenue is Item 19, and the unit count matters as much as the figure. Restore Hyper Wellness reports average gross sales of $911,516 and a median of $850,994 across 198 units (franchised studios open 12+ months, FY2024). SWTHZ reports average gross sales of $573,762 and a median of $556,226 across 13 units (franchised locations open all of FY2024).
Return on capital divides disclosed average sales by the midpoint investment. Restore Hyper Wellness returns 0.87x and SWTHZ returns 0.59x. This measures capital efficiency, not profit — it says how much annual revenue each dollar of build-out buys, and says nothing about the margin either concept actually runs.
Full review
Restore Hyper Wellness
Cost, fees, and Item 19 revenue, reviewed against the 2025 FDD.
Full review
SWTHZ
Cost, fees, and Item 19 revenue, reviewed against the 2026 FDD.
Frequently asked
- Restore Hyper Wellness vs SWTHZ: which is the better franchise?
- Restore discloses 59% more revenue — $911,516 against $573,762 — but the number that should decide this is sample size, not average. Restore reports across 198 studios; SWTHZ reports across 13. Thirteen locations is a description of thirteen locations, not of a system, and it tells you almost nothing about what a new unit will do. SWTHZ enters about $77,000 cheaper at the midpoint, and its royalty starts at 6% and steps up by studio age rather than sitting flat at Restore's 7% — though its 3% brand fund is the heaviest in the category. Both are well under 1.0x capital efficiency, 0.87x against 0.59x. SWTHZ is the newer and far less proven system; whatever territory availability advantage that brings should be weighed against having very little disclosed performance to underwrite.
- How much does a Restore Hyper Wellness franchise cost compared to SWTHZ?
- Restore Hyper Wellness discloses a total initial investment of $777,174 to $1,323,425 in its 2025 FDD, a midpoint of $1,050,300, with an initial franchise fee of $44,500. SWTHZ discloses a total initial investment of $631,798 to $1,314,102 in its 2026 FDD, a midpoint of $972,950, with an initial franchise fee of $45,000.
- Does Restore Hyper Wellness or SWTHZ generate more revenue?
- Restore Hyper Wellness reports average gross sales of $911,516 and a median of $850,994 across 198 units (franchised studios open 12+ months, FY2024). SWTHZ reports average gross sales of $573,762 and a median of $556,226 across 13 units (franchised locations open all of FY2024). These are gross sales, not profit, and the number of units behind each average decides how much it tells you.
- What are the ongoing fees for Restore Hyper Wellness and SWTHZ?
- Restore Hyper Wellness charges a royalty of 7% and a brand fund contribution of 2%. SWTHZ charges a royalty of 6–8% by studio age and a brand fund contribution of 3%.
Other comparisons
Before you rely on any of this
FDDs are filed annually and figures move. Request the current document from each franchisor and read Items 5, 6, 7 and 19 yourself — this is a summary to orient you, not a substitute for the disclosure or for your own advisors. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or compensated by either brand; see our disclosure policy.
Compare every brand at once in the sortable cost comparison table, or run these figures against your own assumptions in the ROI & payback calculator.